In this post we will attempt to place the city within its current global context by looking at current factors shaping cities as well as the historical elements that have defined urban form.
The truth is that it is a result of miscalculation and misallocation of resources at a colossal scale. The resolution of this situation will not be easy. It will require sacrifice and cooperation at a level that we are not accustomed to. This is what the most successful cities world-wide are doing. The factors creating the requirements to be a global player are also channeling cities towards unsustainable urban forms. We see this most acutely in emerging Asian cities. But this trend also affects the cities and small towns that we are studying in the midwest, particularly the “rust belt”.
A significant aspect of global competition in regards to cities is the quality of life that attracts individuals to a given city. Places Rated Almanac has identified the nine 9 Factors below in determining quality of life in urban areas. The exact wording of factors change from time to time but, generally, they are: Cost of Living, Job Growth, Crime Rate, Healthcare, the environment, Transportation, Climate, Recreation, The Arts, and Education.
These factors frame the way we think about successful cities. But, these factors not only affect cities of global stature or aspirations, they also affect small towns. At the Strong Towns blog, Chuck Maroun, states that the key competitive aspect of smaller urban areas may just be their infrastructure.
Quality of life aspects are important but the study of urbanism and cities can not be properly understood without the study of the history, economic developments, or societal and cultural changes that happen concurrently. In order to design cities effectively we must draw upon research developed in these interrelated fields of activity. Aaron Renn over at The Urbanophile has a take on globalization that looks at it from the standpoint of each city’s economic competitiveness and branding. Our approach will be a little different. We will look at key concepts that frame globalization with respect to urban design and policy.
The key concepts in the analysis of urban space development can be seen in the field of urban geography. A great resource in this regard is the book, Urban Geography by Paul Knox, (McGraw Hill 1994). According to Knox the key concepts are:
A factor that influences patterns of urban development and the kinds of relationships fostered between different “cultures” within the city. Partitioning space through the establishment of Legal boundaries affect the city’s ability to raise revenue. Electoral boundaries affect the outcome of elections and the leadership and vision for the city. Cities are simultaneously the products and shapers of economic, social and political change.
is often the basis of individual and group behavior that creates distinct spatial settings. These spatial settings in turn mold the attitudes and behavior of the inhabitants. (think city, town, suburb, rural)
affects the behavior of both the producers and consumers of goods and services. Physical accessibility to jobs, schools, stores, parks, healthcare, are important in determining the level of quality of life in the area.
The distinctiveness of metro regions, cities, districts, and neighborhoods is critical to understanding cities, mapping variations in areas, identifying spatial patterns and establishing linkages that create functional regions.
Place also influences decisions on where to live, where to locate a business or how comfortable one feels in an area.
We are now in the era of the global city. The mega city, city-region, polycentric city, are all manifestations of this 21st century phenomenon. The origins of this city of influence is rooted in the term “world cities”. The term originated in 1915 by Patrick Geddes, an urban planner who used empirically scientific methods of analysis. The term was used to illustrate the importance of a relatively few cities in relation to the world economy.
There are currently three factors affecting the shape of the new global city interdependence according to Knox:
A. Technology has not dissipated cities as prognosticators suggested in the late twentieth century; it has actually connected the most productive urban centers,
B. Metropolitan agglomerations are growing even though center cities are losing population overall.
C. The Wal-Mart distribution model (and now the emerging Amazon virtual/ actual model) and Just-In-Time delivery systems further decentralize the city but expands the agglomeration.
Whatever the viewpoint we take, one thing is certain: This dispersal of the city relationships has led to our dependence on the car as a primary mode of transit and economic generation (via demand for oil and the disposition of commerce in the suburban landscape) and trucking as major transport mode even in the face of rising oil prices. The effects of this dependence and potential solutions will be discussed in part 2 of this series.
A thorough study of these factors reveals that, contrary to assertions of urban researchers such as architect Rem Koolhaas, there is an overall organization to this new global structure of cities; and it will embolden the center cities.
What we see now is that being competitive in the new world-wide market is the most import challenge for our cities. It not only has economic impacts, but physical impacts. That is the topic of Part 2 of this series.